Explícito Cannabis & Coffee with Tamarijuana - Guest: David Malmo-Levine

Desde: Cannabis & Coffee with Tamarijuana

1 5 hace 2 meses

00:00

57:11

Me gusta Me gusta

Descarga Embed

Educación, #advocates, #cannabis, #history, #medicalmarijuana, #paceradionetwork

Today David Malmo-Levine joins Tamarijuana for some cannabis, coffee and some conversation that can go from his case before the Supreme Court of Canada (2003) to his thoughts on todays cannabis legalization plus much more

Cannabis & Coffee with Tamarijuana airs Wednesdays on PACEradio.net

Episodios

00:01

C&C Tamarijuana Intro
26:39

Sponsor Network Audio Set 4
55:21

C&C Tamarijuana Closing

PACE Radio Network hace 2 meses desde Spreaker.com

Paraclete....... I spoke with David following the show and past along your questions.. he says.. "1) nobody told me not to challenge the pot laws, ever, and 2) if you think these arguments are good you should try them out yourself - let us all know how it goes."....... you can send any response you may have onto him - Al
PACE Radio Network hace 2 meses desde Desktop

i'm sorry but i'm just seeing your comments now....but the show is over so i won't be able to get your questions answered. .
Paraclete Edward Jay Robin hace 2 meses desde Spreaker.com

Why is not the fact that Genesis 1:26-29 gifts all herbs to man not brought forward in a Notice to admit exemplified with Deuteronomy 4:2, 12:32 and the question as to who under a Christian monarchy sworn to defend the laws of God gets to make God's gifts criminal?
Paraclete Edward Jay Robin hace 2 meses desde Spreaker.com

Why when informed that Justice Canada's weakspot was the formation of people names into persons of law did David and Mark ignore the simple fact that there is no law that allows anyone to alter your name?
Paraclete Edward Jay Robin hace 2 meses desde Spreaker.com

I am wondering why David ignored the good advise to not challenge to the supreme court regarding Cannabis when with Mark Emery when ignoring the advise meant losing the 1979 Alberta Hauser decision proving all cannabis laws were civil legislation